Wednesday, 17 November 2010

Rachel and Hannah's Continuity Project

You can see Rachel and Hannah's Continuity Video here. Please post comments on their blogs (links to the right or above):

Rachel and Hannah - Continuity Project from Chris Earl on Vimeo.

12 comments:

  1. Did not spot any continuity errors which is obviously a good thing however as the letter was shown I thought I heard a laugh in the background and also Hannah looks like she's dying to smile on the close up shot of her face. I didnt understand what the video was really about and I dont know if thats the idea of the video but all in all it seems like its been put together well and the camera was relitively still at all times, well done.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The storyline is good but i dont really undertsand what it is about. At one point you can hear you laugh so you should have done more editing to make sure that you couldnt hear it. You used all of the criteria; action match, 180 degree rule and shot reverse shot. There werent any continuity errors which is good; well done.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I liked how you stuck all those letters together, very creative :) you included everything that was required, the only thing i would point out was the sound was a bit echoey. Other than that everything was great.

    ReplyDelete
  4. overall the storyline was good eventhough i didnt really understand what was going on this could be improved by showing what happened when somebody saw,but there was no continuity errors and the camera was still at most times, however you could here laughing when the close up of the letter. but it is a good video well done.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Didnt spot any continuity error's however the video was very deiffeicult to understand what the story line was about maybe you could have been more specific. Also you could hear a faint laugh in the background which could have easily been edited out. Howevcer you have used everything that was required in the video. Well done :)

    ReplyDelete
  6. There were no continuity errors however the storyline was a little unclear. You did include everything needed. Well done.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Overall it had all the critria and looked good with the reverse shot and. However the storyline was a bit unclear and then there is laughing that can be heard. But it was good as it had a varity of shots such as long shot and close ups which looks good. There was also no continity errors. Well done :-)

    ReplyDelete
  8. didnt spot any errors in the filming and i thaught you must have thaught through where the camera was positioned allot, evereything is good it was a great video well done !

    ReplyDelete
  9. Your vedio was is very good. I didnt spot any continuity error, only spot that I found was the laugh in the background. ^.,^

    ReplyDelete
  10. Good camera work, all criteria was there though confusing story. Good continuity well done.

    ReplyDelete
  11. the acting was good in this video i thought. Also there was lots of camera shots included which met the criteria of the task. overall great video.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Opening shot is well framed, although I'm unsure about the editing between this and the second shot. The 180 rule is well observed as the two characters enter the door. Your pan across is a little jerky, although initially quite smooth. The two-shot is okay, and I like the use of the slightly canted angle when the note is shown - very film noir. However, this sequence would benefit from more content - a shot of the note being taken out, a reaction shot from Hannah. You should think about how to clean the audio up - maybe fade between the various shots in order to prevent the glitches. The "over-the-shoulder" shot is inventive. You can hear some laughing at about 0:54 when the CU of the note is shown. The final s/rs shots could have been cut a little earlier. You will have to point me towards the action match. In summary, then, some good framing, and 180/ srs used well, but I would like to see a wider range of shots and edits used in order to make your work look more structure.

    ReplyDelete